Digst

Xi Warns Trump of Putin's Regret Over Ukraine Invasion

· news

Xi’s Cautionary Note Falls on Deaf Ears in Moscow

The revelation that Chinese President Xi Jinping warned his US counterpart, Donald Trump, about Vladimir Putin’s invasion of Ukraine has sparked debate over China’s role in the ongoing conflict. While some see this development as a potential game-changer, others argue that Beijing’s influence is overstated.

Xi’s words to Trump were reportedly spoken during talks on Ukraine and the International Criminal Court, where he expressed concerns about the long-term consequences of Putin’s actions. This sentiment was not new from Xi, but rather an elaboration on previous statements made in private conversations with Western leaders. The significance lies in the context in which they were spoken.

The Chinese president’s remarks to Trump came against the backdrop of growing tensions between Beijing and Washington over issues like trade, security, and human rights. China has also been expanding its economic ties with Russia, including energy deals that would see an additional 50 billion cubic meters of gas per year delivered from Russia’s Arctic fields via Mongolia to China.

This development highlights the limits of Xi’s influence over Putin. Despite Beijing’s growing economic clout and diplomatic efforts, Moscow remains determined to press on with its military campaign in Ukraine. Ian Storey, a principal fellow at the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute, noted that “Xi doesn’t wield that kind of influence over Putin” and that the Chinese understand how a defeat for Russia in Ukraine would weaken Putin’s political standing.

The implications of this dynamic are far-reaching. If Beijing cannot persuade its Russian counterpart to end the war, then it is clear that China’s diplomatic efforts have been ineffective. This raises questions about the sincerity of China’s claims to be a neutral party and peace mediator in the conflict.

Moreover, Xi’s words to Trump underscore the complexities of great-power politics in the 21st century. As Storey noted, “The Xi-Putin summit will telegraph to the world that the China-Russia strategic partnership remains the cornerstone of both countries’ foreign policies.” This bond between autocrats is a source of concern for many who see it as a challenge to Western values and interests.

As the two leaders meet in Beijing this week, they are likely to reinforce their message that any attempt by Washington to drive a wedge between them will fail. But what does this mean for the future of great-power relations? Will China’s growing economic ties with Russia come at the expense of its relationship with the United States?

The answer lies not so much in Beijing’s diplomatic efforts, but rather in the willingness of Moscow and Washington to engage with each other on the issues that matter most. For now, it seems that Xi’s cautionary note has fallen on deaf ears in Moscow.

China’s engagement with Russia reinforces its message of consistent diplomacy, while Western pressure only serves to underscore Beijing’s determination to maintain its relationships with strategic partners. This has significant implications for great-power politics in the 21st century. If Xi’s words to Trump are any indication, it seems that Beijing is more interested in maintaining its economic ties with Moscow than in pressuring Putin to end the war.

The bond between Xi and Putin has been forged over years of diplomatic efforts and growing economic ties. This partnership sends a clear message to the world: that China and Russia will continue to prioritize their strategic interests above all else. Any attempt by Washington to drive a wedge between them is likely to fail.

As the two leaders meet in Beijing this week, they are likely to reinforce their message that the China-Russia strategic partnership remains the cornerstone of both countries’ foreign policies. But what does this mean for the future of great-power relations? Will China’s growing economic ties with Russia come at the expense of its relationship with the United States?

The world will continue to watch closely as the situation unfolds. For now, it seems that Xi’s cautionary note has fallen on deaf ears in Moscow. The future of great-power relations hangs precariously in the balance.

Reader Views

  • CS
    Correspondent S. Tan · field correspondent

    The Xi-Trump conversation is often touted as evidence of China's growing influence on global affairs, but let's not get carried away. Beijing's economic leverage over Moscow is real, yet this hasn't been enough to halt Russia's Ukraine aggression. The real story here isn't about Xi's failed diplomatic attempts, but rather the strategic trade-offs China has made with its Eurasian allies. By prioritizing gas deals and infrastructure projects, Beijing has secured vital energy supplies while sidestepping direct involvement in a costly conflict – a pragmatic move that speaks volumes about China's willingness to engage in delicate balancing acts on the global stage.

  • CM
    Columnist M. Reid · opinion columnist

    While Xi Jinping's warning to Trump about Putin's Ukraine invasion may be seen as a bold diplomatic move, we should not overlook the fact that China's economic ties with Russia are also creating incentives for continued hostilities. Beijing's energy deals with Moscow are contingent on Russia's ability to maintain its grip on Eastern Europe, suggesting that China is quietly backing Putin's play - at least in the short term. This nuance undermines the idea of Xi as a lone dissenter against Russian aggression.

  • EK
    Editor K. Wells · editor

    The real story here isn't Xi's warning to Trump, but rather the disconnect between China's diplomatic efforts and Russia's military actions in Ukraine. While Beijing is expanding its economic ties with Moscow, Putin remains undeterred by Xi's cautionary note. This suggests that Beijing's influence over Russia extends only as far as its wallet, and raises questions about the effectiveness of Chinese diplomacy in shaping global events. The real test lies not in what Beijing says, but in what it can actually do to sway Russian policy.

Related